Andrew Girdwood's blog - Latest Comments in SEOmoz ranking factors 2009

Re: SEOmoz ranking factors 2009

Andrew Girdwood — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:47:51 -0000

I think I agreed with it - links will become less important. This shouldn't challenge the more advantaged SEO agencies who've already evolved their strategies. It's bad news to those SEO agencies which make money through link brokerage.

Re: SEOmoz ranking factors 2009

Paul Gailey — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:54:16 -0000

I refer to the 48% figure for http://is.gd/2xPDV about importance of links in the last question.

Re: SEOmoz ranking factors 2009

Andrew Girdwood — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:10:43 -0000

I can't even remember what the last question was - the write up puts geo-targeting stuff at the end. You can't mean that.

Re: SEOmoz ranking factors 2009

Paul Gailey — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:36:40 -0000

how did you respond to that last question listed on the report? isn´t that the most significant in terms of strategic future of seo/m companies?

Re: SEOmoz ranking factors 2009

Andrew Girdwood — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:42:59 -0000

ARHG are my odd initials :) I use Twitterfeed to keep my Twitter stream up dated with my blog and prefix those tweets with ARHG to denote its a blog post. It's a common practise but people often prefix with "Just posted" or "Blogged", etc.

Re: SEOmoz ranking factors 2009

Paul Gailey — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:46:10 -0000

what´s with arhg? (i see now, but no idea how it got appended onto that earlier retweet)